Do Sky and the BBC miss the point with their social media policies?
Related posts:
- Social media – friend or foe? | DEBATE This week, The Student and The Intern went to a...
- Journalists should spend 10% of their time on social media At last week’s news:rewired conference, I attended a session about...
- Martin Cloake: Solberg’s 10% rule proves we still don’t get social media Martin Cloake is a journalist, award-winning author, editor, trainer and...
- Duncan Mykura: super injunctions, the law and social media Duncan Mykura is a fourth-year Modern Languages and European Studies...
- An Interview with Emma Cossey: Freelance blogger and Social media journalist | Part one Emma Cossey is a freelance blogger/writer/web editor. Multi tasking numerous...
The BBC's policy has never been to be the quickest but to be he most accurate. People trust BBC News in a way they don't trust other organisations so I think it's completely right for them to have to check facts before they tweet a story. The Guardian article has a misleading title because the policy is to tell your colleagues before you break a story on Twitter, not to just not break it on Twitter at all.During the August riots the editor of BBC Radio Sheffield retweeted someone saying "We're hearing reports of rioting in Sheffield"...there were no riots in Sheffield. The audience were furious! It could even have lead to police resources being diverted away from where they were needed because people trust the BBC.
So in defence of the BBC's policy - it's just applying the same rigour to tweeting as you would to broadcasting, because tweeting IS broadcasting.As for Sky News's policy I haven't actually seen it but I'm sure they have good reasons for it or the policy has been misquoted (as often happens),



