Matt Hewson: As countries continue to put their media behind paywalls isn’t it time we took note?
Matt Hewson is a philosophy undergraduate at the University of Birmingham. He writes for the student paper Redbrick and occasionally blog at HuffPost UK.
Paying to read the news online is for many of us, an unusual concept. Most British newspapers have thus far opted to keep their internet-based content-free. Not so in Slovenia – since the 16th of January, readers have had to buy a subscription in order to access most news sites. Nine major Slovene publishers have banded together to create a national paywall that will guard elements of their collective material.
The move was coordinated by Piano Media, who were also behind the erecting of a paywall in Slovakia last year. The process will be very similar to the change that took place in Slovakia, but there are a few key differences.
The amount of information paywalled in Slovenia will be three or even five times more than in their European cousin, peaking for some publications at around fifteen percent of all content. Slovenian users will also find themselves paying around €2 more than in Slovakia – €4.89 for a monthly subscription rather than Slovakia’s €2.90. There will however be no restrictions on commenting, something that was initially in place in Slovakia, and a measure that was not received favourably; as Niemen Lab noted during an interview with Piano Media’s CEO, “citizens of a former Communist regime don’t want their free speech impinged upon.”
Broadly, the plan is to keep only the most interesting and exclusive content behind the wall, with a view to incrementally the amount over time. Features, interviews and columns are all to be restricted. It’s an interesting idea and a sensible one too – free online material simply can’t justify itself.
This system allows for entirely new revenue, with no losses, as subscriptions aren’t yet in lieu of advertising. While ads may eventually be dropped for subscribers, they’re currently set to stay. Marko Crnkovič, who works within digital development at Delo, Slovenia’s largest media outlet, wrote on the Delo site: “proceeds from the sale of advertising space on the Internet remain relevant.”
A deliberate desire to enact the changes gradually has seen a particularly novel approach from some of the paywall’s participants. Core information will still be available in most articles, but extra detail or multimedia elements will only available to subscribers. This is, Crnkovič said, to avoid alienating those who can’t afford to pay; “we will make sure that no one – not even those who will not be able or willing to pay – remains empty-handed.”
Furthermore, the effect that the wall has on the media landscape in Slovenia will be interesting to observe. The project’s predecessor in Slovakia failed to get one of the country’s major tabloids involved which, alongside Slovakia’s role as a national paywall guinea pig, is possibly related to their lower monthly subscription (although Piano Media have been extremely coy when it comes to releasing any figures). In Slovenia nearly every major publication is on board. What will this do to smaller newspapers or magazines, which still provide free content? It would seem that Piano Media have been almost wholly successful in coordinating links between major publishers and publications; any remaining publications will be so specialised that their readership will be rather more secure.
Would such a system ever work in the UK? It’s not completely unforeseeable – The Times already have a paywall, as do The Financial Times. Yet a coordinated effort between publishers and proprietors looks at best unlikely. It would be tough to reconcile paying for hard news coverage with the presence of the BBC – people already have to buy a TV license, so why spend more when the Beeb provide good quality journalism?
That said, there could be scope for paywalling some of the magazine content, the sort of material that isn’t available anywhere else. Piano Media have said that bringing a system to the UK is some way off, and in an interview with journalism.co.uk CEO Tomas Bella also spoke of the problems caused by the status of English as a world language.
While it doesn’t affect the UK yet, paywalls abroad should not be ignored. Piano Media plan to roll out more in Europe this year, and their expansion seems likely to continue. Free online journalism simply isn’t sustainable, for journalists or publishers. Expect to start paying. Soon.
Related posts:
- Journalists should spend 10% of their time on social media At last week’s news:rewired conference, I attended a session about...
- We can help to continue the positive changes in women’s magazine journalism Eva Wiseman recently wrote in the Observer magazine about the...
- Mikey Smith: Universities take note – convergence can revolutionize your student media setup Your own Uni might be print, programme and radio savvy,...
- Storify: misuse, monetisation, and the media. Storify has to be hot property of the year, in...
- Biding your time post-job interview It’s been a few days since I returned from...
Trackbacks
Podcasts
Recommended
“Embrace the fear” and other lessons from my time in student media
After finishing my stint in student media, I couldn’t help but look
Student media and a degree: getting the balance
The time is 5.09am, and the birds are twittering outside my window.
Receiving feedback and learning from criticism
I don’t know what I was expecting when I opened that email.
Comments
nicki_ on Universities fight back against unpaid internships
No 'insensitive'? Incentive, maybe?Posted May 21, 2013hvl92 on Universities fight back against unpaid internships
For someone who aspires to be a journalist, you should really learn to proofread.Posted May 21, 2013



[...] The Telegraph is nudging its readers along. The Times is trying to monetise its online readers, whether or not you agree with how they’re doing it. For the sake of its readers and its journalists, N&S needs to spell out how it plans the [...]