I couldn't agree more with this article - as a fellow undergrad studying an 'academic' degree, I'd hoped that it would put me ahead of the game (transferable skills as mentioned, an area of specialism, interests outside of journalism) come graduation but it actually seems to do the opposite which begs the question, providing we know we want to be hacks come the time of uni applications, shouldn't we just all do BAs in journalism? I was always told to steer clear of an undergrad degree in the field and to do an MA at a later date if necessary - perhaps it was good advice but I can't help feeling like I've wasted 3 years and got myself in £25000 in debt for an unjustifyable cause...It's a scary thought that doing a degree in anything outside of journalism could actually delay entry into the industry and, potentially, hinder applications to internships and job opportunities which ask specifically for journalism graduates.
I'm not underestimating the power of BA Journalism (in fact, given my chance again, I'd probably do exactly that!) but shouldn't more value be placed on the fact that those of us studying for academic degrees will be equipped with different aptitudes, knowledge and experiences, come graduation? It also shows that we are committed enough to another subject to study it for 3 years and might even lead us to develop an alternative - yet interesting - perspective from which to write in the future. At the very least, employers should welcome a wide range of applicants, what with variety being the spice of life and all that!


