Tweet
Register | Login | Sign up to our newsletter
Wannabe Hacks
 
  • Advice
    • Getting started
    • How to guides
    • Production
    • Reporting
    • Tools
    • Writing
  • Comment
    • Debate
    • Expert Insight
  • Finding a job
    • Applications
    • CVs
    • Interviews
    • Work experience
  • Guest posts
  • Industries
    • Digital and online
    • Magazine
    • Newspaper
    • Photojournalism
    • Radio
    • Television
  • Routes into journalism
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Postgraduate course
    • Freelancing
    • Shifts
    • Short course and NCTJ
    • Training schemes
    • Undergraduate course
    • Work experience and interning
    • Student media
  • How to guides
  • Podcast
  • Video
16. December, 2011 Comment, Magazine, Newspaper
This article has 2 comments

The Leveson Inquiry: what does “in the public interest” really mean?

by Hannah Bass

The News of the World’s “fake sheikh”, investigative journalist Mazher Mahmood, told the Leveson Inquiry earlier this week that he risks his life on a daily basis and that his work has led to over 260 successful criminal prosecutions. On the same day, the sacked Neville Thurbeck told the inquiry that the paper had decided to expose David Beckham’s affair because it was “in the public interest”.

“The Beckhams had been using their marriage to endorse products,” Thurbeck said. “They were making millions of pounds on the back of that wholesome image and we thought it very important at the time to expose that.”

And the law is largely on his side. When legal disputes following such exposés arise, the courts often come down in favour of the paper, saying that the celebrity is selling a sham image. It’s “in the public interest” that they be unmasked.

But come on, can the press really claim to be acting as a public moral watchdog by exposing a footballer’s infidelities or a starlet’s plastic surgery? We don’t expect our celebrities to be beacons of truth and morality – in fact, we’re rather sickened when they are. Celebrities, of the kind which court the media, are merely characters to us and their downfall is as an integral part of the brand they’re selling.

Rags and redtops are definitely serving a certain kind of “public interest”. Whether we like it or not, there is a vast mass of people for whom the sleaze and scandals of B list celebs is of more interest than government corruption – because it’s news as entertainment. Gossip mags far out-sell broadsheet newspapers in this country, and the Daily Mail website with its celeb “sidebar of shame” as some have called it, gets something like 4.5 million visitors a day.

It has been said – and I’d agree – that the celebrities which feature in tabloids and gossip rags have entered into a Faustian pact with the press. So too, in a way, have the readers. We cannot pay for and devour these salacious stories and then expect journalists to come up with any better reason for producing them. Currently “in the public interest” seems to mean little more than pandering to the public’s purses. Since paparazzi regulation seems impossible and the law already covers the crimes committed by phone-hacking journalists, perhaps the most fundamental thing which could come out of the Leveson Inquiry would be a new definition of “public interest”.

We need, too, to separate the actions and aims of celebrity journalists from true investigative reporters for whom, in the words of Mahmood, the end justifies the means. This would also affect the way we remember the Leveson Inquiry, which at times has felt more like a red carpet than a public investigation.

Legally, yes, the hacking and harassment of these celebrities is a crime and should be punished. But it is not a crime that should be put in the same category as the violation of the privacy of anonymous victims such as Milly Dowler’s parents and even the widows of dead soldiers.

What do you think? Are celebrities and readers engaged in a Faustian pact with the tabloid press?

Related posts:

  1. Photography ethics and the media – will things change following the Leveson inquiry? So, now it is not just the journalists who are...
  2. Phone hacking in the US: Chiquita Banana and the public right to know Bent banana executives, cocaine smuggling, bribery in Colombia and elements...
  3. The Undergrad asks how The Leveson Inquiry will affect media law In just over two weeks time, I will come face-to-face...
  4. Hannah Clugston: Leveson should be looking at the gossip mags for bad journalism Hannah Clugston is an aspiring fashion journalist, based in York...
  5. Leveson: Why are we here? With extracts from The Phone Hacking Scandal: Journalism on Trial This post is based on the hackademic textbook, The Phone Hacking...
1 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
ClelandThomCTJT
ClelandThomCTJT 5pts

@wannabehacks Problem with a definition is that it's very limiting. Every case should be decided on its merits.

Trackbacks

  1. 2011 in review: a revolutionary year for journalism | Wannabe Hacks says:
    January 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM

    [...] The Leveson Inquiry, the subsequent public inquiry into the culture and ethics of the British media, has since become a soap opera of celebrities and editors revealing the wrongdoings of the press. I dare say we’re enjoying the Leveson coverage almost as much as we enjoyed the stories that arose from the scandals these disgraced journalists uncovered.  The result of the inquiry remains to be seen, but its impact is already being felt among journalists. [...]

Register  |  Login

@wannabehacks

Podcasts


Recommended

“Embrace the fear” and other lessons from my time in student media
6 / 12 / 2012 1 comment

After finishing my stint in student media, I couldn’t help but look

Read more

Student media and a degree: getting the balance
22 / 11 / 2012 28 comments

The time is 5.09am, and the birds are twittering outside my window.

Read more

Receiving feedback and learning from criticism
12 / 11 / 2012 1 comment

I don’t know what I was expecting when I opened that email.

Read more


Comments


  • kj_corcoran on CV Workshop: Ellie House

    Hi Ellie. Brave of you to put this up - I remember getting some tough love about a year ago....
    Posted May 24, 2013
  • Jenni Graham

    _JenniGraham on CV Workshop: Ellie House

    Hi Ellie. I've just had a session on CVs, so I'll hopefully be able to share some of the advice I...
    Posted May 24, 2013
 
About

Wannabe Hacks is a living, breathing journalism resource. All our content is produced by aspiring journalists. Our aim is to offer an insight into the different routes into journalism, provide in-depth commentary about the big issues and stimulate discussion around what matters to you.

Current Editors: George Berridge, Natasha Clark, Liam Corcoran, Jenni Graham and Caroline Mortimer.

Categories

  • Finding a job
  • Comment
  • How to guides
  • Advice
  • Guest posts
  • Routes into journalism
  • Industries
Follow

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Like us on Facebook
  • RSS feeds

Website designed & developed by push.play | go back to the top

Copyright 2012 Wannabe Hacks
More about us | Contact us | Wannabe Hacks in the news | Community Guidelines | Advertising